© 2001-2007
Peter Nordberg. E-mail:
webmaster@daubertontheweb.com. Last revised: 9/17/06. See the
reviews.
Buy the T-shirt.
Read the disclaimers.
View the FAQ.
|
Illinois Overview
By C.E. Petit, Esq. Illinois calls itself a "Frye state," but Illinois state courts vary their reasoning among the Frye standard ("general and common use," People v. Jennings, 96 N.E. 1077 (Ill. 1911)), the text of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and a reliability inquiry (People v.
Basler, 740 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2000)). It is probably more accurate to call Illinois a "Frye plus reliability" state, but there are several ways to demonstrate "reliability." The Illinois Supreme Court has not made an explicit judgment on how important "reliability" is, nor what that means, post-Daubert. Instead, admission of opinion evidence seems to be divided into two classes:
Illinois has a three-tiered court system.
The trial ("circuit") courts cover from one to three counties each, with judges maintaining chambers and seats in most mid-sized (25,000 or so) and above towns and cities. The intermediate appeals courts are divided into five districts:
When discussing opinion evidence, case citation in Illinois appellate decisions tends to be extremely sparse, with two exceptions: determining whether a technique is "novel" and determining whether a particular expert is qualified. Otherwise, the Illinois courts tend to pay close attention to the text of the rules of evidence and to longstanding principles of evidence law. This even extends to denying that federal interpretations of the Federal Rules of Evidence bind Illinois courts in their interpretations, even though the Federal Rules of Evidence have been explicitly adopted in Illinois. See, e.g., People v. Miller, 670 N.E.2d 721, 731 & n.3 (Ill. 1996). |
|