© 2001-2007 Peter Nordberg. E-mail: webmaster@daubertontheweb.com. Last revised: 9/17/06. See the reviews. Buy the T-shirt. Read the disclaimers. View the FAQ.

 

Generic Expert Deposition Checklist

     After Daubert, counsel deposing experts will want to prepare highly specific lines of questioning based on the detailed content of the expert's report.  This checklist is offered only as a generic starting point.  The author solicits suggestions for additional points to include. 

               I.      Personal information

a.     Name

b.     Home address

c.      Business address(es)

d.     Current employer(s)

                                                              i.      Identity of employer

                                                            ii.      Nature of employerís business

                                                          iii.      Employerís affiliations with parties

                                                           iv.      How long employed there

                                                             v.      Job title(s) and duties

                                                           vi.      Organizational chart (how many personnel, doing what)

                                                         vii.      Expertís reporting relationships (up & down)

                                                       viii.      Usual hourly rate billed by employer for expertís services

                                                           ix.      Same, paid by employer to expert

                                                             x.      Any document retention policies?

1.      Any document retention policies re litigation matters?

e.     Member of any professional organizations?

             II.      Education

a.     For each college and graduate institution:

                                                              i.      Years attended

                                                            ii.      Major or concentration

                                                          iii.      Degree

                                                           iv.      Subject of thesis or dissertation

                                                             v.      Any courses in __________?

                                                           vi.      Honors, prizes, fellowships, etc.

                                                         vii.      Teaching work while attending (as graduate instructor, etc.)

b.     Professional seminars, continuing education, etc.

            III.      Licenses and certifications

a.     Issuing authority

b.     Any tests or training?

c.      Dates issued

d.     Periodicity of renewal

e.     Requirements for renewal

f.        Any disciplinary actions, revocations, etc.?

         IV.      Employment history

a.     For each position:

                                                              i.      Identity of employer

                                                            ii.      Nature of employerís business

                                                          iii.      Employerís affiliations with parties

                                                           iv.      How hired

                                                             v.      Dates employed there

                                                           vi.      Job title(s) and duties

                                                         vii.      Organizational chart

                                                       viii.      Reporting relationships

                                                           ix.      Nature of compensation (salary, etc.)

                                                             x.      Why left

           V.      Publication history

a.     Does expertís report list all publications in last ten years?

b.     Which publications from list are germane to expertís work in this case?

c.      Any previous publications (before the last ten years) germane to expertís work in this case?

d.     For each publication identified as pertinent:

                                                              i.      Did any other publisher or journal reject the publication?

                                                            ii.      Was the publication peer-reviewed?

1.      By whom?

2.      Any comments during the peer-review process?

3.      Any revisions resulting from the peer-review?

                                                          iii.      Drafts retained?

                                                           iv.      Anything in the article that the expert would now want to change or revise?

1.      If yes, has author done that?  If not, why not?

                                                             v.      Identification, qualifications, roles of co-authors and other persons who assisted

                                                           vi.      What generated expertís interest in area?

                                                         vii.      How would expert summarize the publicationís thesis or content?

                                                       viii.      Further research:

1.      Did publication identify the need for any?

a.      Why or why not?

2.      Was there, in any case, a need for any?

a.      Why or why not?

3.      Has any needed further research been done?

a.      If yes, identify

b.      If no, why not?

                                                           ix.      Does expert know how frequently publication is cited?

                                                             x.      Has anyone requested right to reprint?

                                                           xi.      Is expert familiar with any literature expressing contrary views or reaching contrary findings?

1.      Citations

2.      How and why does expert differ with literature expressing contrary views?

                                                         xii.      Any compensation for authoring the publication?

         VI.      Career as expert witness

a.     Does expertís report identify all cases where expert has testified at trial or by deposition in last four years?

b.     Any other cases in last four years where expert prepared report but did not end up testifying?

c.      Any previous cases (prior to the last four years) similar to this one?

d.     For each case:

                                                              i.      Subject matter of case

                                                            ii.      Subject matter of testimony

                                                          iii.      For whom did expert testify?

                                                           iv.      What law firm retained expert?

                                                             v.      Did expert prepare report?

                                                           vi.      Who assisted?

                                                         vii.      Was expert deposed?

                                                       viii.      Did expert testify at trial?

                                                           ix.      Any motions to exclude expertís testimony?

                                                             x.      How was expert compensated?

        VII.      Expertís retention

a.     Date retained in this case

b.     Persons making initial and subsequent contacts to retain expert

c.      Compensation arrangements

d.     Expertís understanding of expertís assignment

      VIII.      Expertís opinions

a.     What opinions has expert formed?

b.     For each opinion:

                                                              i.      Who assisted expert?

                                                            ii.      What advice or assistance did counsel offer?

                                                          iii.      What data did expert review?

                                                           iv.      How did expert decide what data to review?

                                                             v.      What data did expert end up relying on?

                                                           vi.      If any data were not used, why?

                                                         vii.      Does report include (not just ďlistĒ) all data considered?

1.      If not, were data retained?

                                                       viii.      Where did expert obtain data, and who assisted?

                                                           ix.      What literature did expert review?

                                                             x.      On what literature does expert place reliance?

                                                           xi.      For each publication on which expert relies:

1.      Who published?

a.      If a trade or industrial organization, e.g., explore its interests and constituencies

2.      Can expert summarize pertinent information, theory, or methodology from publication?  How did publication assist expert?

3.      Is expert familiar with authorsí reputation, experience, etc.?

4.      Was publication peer-reviewed?

                                                         xii.      Can expert state every methodology relied upon in forming opinion, whether or not covered in literature just described?

                                                       xiii.      For each such theory or method:

1.      Is the expert an expert in it?

a.      Any education, experience, etc.?

2.      Can expert identify any literature supporting it?

3.      Can expert summarize method or theory?

4.      Has method or theory been tested?

5.      Can method or theory be falsified (and how)?

6.      Does method or theory have a known error rate?

7.      Is method or theory generally accepted?

8.      Identify any standards controlling the methodís application

9.      Is expert aware of any dissenting views?

a.      Citations to literature

10. How would expert respond to dissenting views?

11. What is the context in which the theory or method is usually applied?

a.      Litigation contexts

b.      Others

12. Are there certain kinds of question that this theory or method cannot answer (e.g., causation, fault)

                                                       xiv.      Has expert ever done work in this area outside the litigation context?

1.      ďWell, sir, how would you define [this area]?Ē

                                                         xv.      Would any theories or methods not used by expert be potentially pertinent?

1.      Why did expert not employ these?

                                                       xvi.      Does report recite every step taken by expert to reach his or her opinion?  With enough specificity that another expert in same field could duplicate results?

                                                     xvii.      Does report contain complete statement of all bases and reasons for opinion?

                                                   xviii.      Were there any false trails or abandoned approaches?

                                                       xix.      Anything in the report concerning this opinion that the expert would want to change or revise?

                                                         xx.      Any further research desirable?

                                                       xxi.      What is the expert not opining on (liability, causation, etc.)?

         IX.      Expert represented by counsel at deposition?

           X.      Communications with attorneys

a.     Statement of expertís assignment

b.     Any restrictions on assignment

c.      Any communications re Daubert?

d.     Documents supplied to expert

e.     Involvement of attorneys in drafting opinion

f.        Deposition preparation