Friday, February 02, 2007

On the Sisyphean Project of Gaining General Acceptance

Compare IPCC with AEI.

2 Comments:

Ted F. writes ...

That Guardian story is painfully dishonest.

1:53 PM  
pn writes ...

But whatever you may think, Ted, of the Guardian's journalistic standards, the core fact reported is not in dispute. AEI is commissioning dubiety on anthropogenic climate change at $10k/crack. That's fine, so long as we remember, when the time comes to review the fruits of AEI's philanthropy, that the bare existence of a skeptical literature, in such a context, does not, by itself, supply occasion for actual skepticism.

3:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fed. R. Evid. 702: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.