Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Utter Hooey (Discovery Institute Edition)

Just when you thought maybe the nonsense was over . . .

posted by pn at 8:02 PM  

1 Comments:

yclipse writes ...

I guess the DI folks don't understand that the idea behind submitting a set of "proposed findings of fact and rulings of law" is that they be accepted and adopted by the court. Verbatim adoption is expected -- if the proposals are intelligently designed.

10:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fed. R. Evid. 702: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.