Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Nebraska Supreme Court Reverses Exclusion of Differential Diagnosis Testimony that Trauma Caused Fibromyalgia

Last Friday, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that a trial court should have admitted testimony from experts who opined, based on a differential diagnosis, that a plaintiff's fibromyalgia was caused by her automobile accident. The court said that although the generic causal link between trauma and fibromyalgia is subject to heated medico-scientific dispute, there is enough support in the peer-reviewed literature for a physician to "rule in" trauma as a potential cause. The high court also held that the experts took sufficient steps to "rule out" other causes. The opinion was unanimous. See Epp v. Lauby, 271 Neb. 640 (Neb. 2006).

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fed. R. Evid. 702: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.