Friday, February 17, 2006

Sir Roy Meadow Wins Appeal

A court has overturned the decision by England's General Medical Council striking Sir Roy Meadow from the national medical register, according to the Guardian and other British press sources. The sanction had been issued because Meadow gave inaccurate and misleading expert testimony for the prosecution in the trial of a woman charged with murdering two sons who suffered crib death. Finding that Meadow's testimony was offered in good faith, the court held that Meadow should enjoy testimonial immunity from professional discipline.

We remain disturbed by the repellent zealotry with which Sir Meadow has pursued his testimonial crusade against innocent mothers whose babies have died under tragic circumstances. But as we have said before, we don't think professional discipline is the proper remedy.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fed. R. Evid. 702: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.