Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Research as Tortious Misconduct?

The Los Angeles Times is running a lengthy story by Maura Dolan on what happened to Elizabeth Loftus after she investigated the underlying facts in another researcher's published case study on repressed memory.

The case study involved a woman, known to us only as "Jane Doe," with an alleged "recovered memory" of being sexually abused by her mother as a child. When Loftus published her critique challenging the findings in the earlier researcher's work, Jane Doe (whom Loftus did not identify by name) responded by filing suit, alleging that Loftus had defamed her and invaded her privacy. An appeal in the case is reportedly pending.

The University of Washington, where Loftus was then a faculty member, also launched a two-year ethical investigation, in which she was eventually cleared of misconduct.

1 Comments:

drjohnfielder@daubertinstitutue,com writes ...

Painful. Got to be joking

6:35 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fed. R. Evid. 702: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.