Wednesday, June 22, 2005

Prosecution May Not Call Defendant's Uncalled Experts, Says PA Supreme Court

According to AP reports, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that if a criminal defendant retains an expert but does not call him or her at trial, the prosecution may not call the expert itself. To allow prosecutors to do so would put defense counsel "in the unenviable position of independently investigating evidence that may exonerate their clients, while, at the same time, risking the creation of evidence against their clients," Chief Justice Ralph J. Cappy reportedly wrote. The opinion is not yet available online.

Update: The opinion in Commonwealth v. Kennedy is posted now.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fed. R. Evid. 702: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.