Tuesday, December 07, 2004

10th Circuit Upholds Causation Testimony in Products Suit

The Tenth Circuit has published an opinion upholding the trial court's ruling admitting the causation testimony of two plaintiffs' experts in a products liability suit arising from a gas explosion. In an extended discussion, the court approved the experts' reliance on inferential methods bearing a close resemblance to differential diagnosis, but which the Tenth Circuit panel preferred to call "reasoning to the best inference" in the non-medical context. See Bitler v. A.O. Smith Corp., No. 02-1527 (10th Cir. Dec. 6, 2004) (Lucero, McKay, & Hartz, JJ.).

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fed. R. Evid. 702: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.